Visit Aine MacDermot's column >>

AINE MACDERMOTHome Page

Legalize Cannabis
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 47; Links Seeded: 5738
Member Since: 2/2006Last Seen: 11/06/2009

William Boyd: The Secret Persuaders

advertisement

It was 1940, the Nazis were in the ascendant, the Blitz at its deadliest, and Britain's last hope was to bring a reluctant United States into the war. So it was that the largest covert operation in UK history was launched. William Boyd sheds light on a forgotten spy ring.

"British Security Coordination". The phrase is bland, almost defiantly ordinary, depicting perhaps some sub-committee of a minor department in a lowly Whitehall ministry. In fact BSC, as it was generally known, represented one of the largest covert operations in British spying history; a covert operation, moreover, that was run not in Occupied France, nor in the Soviet Union during the cold war, but in the US, our putative ally, during 1940 and 1941, before Pearl Harbor and the US's eventual participation in the war in Europe against Nazi Germany.

When Winston Churchill became prime minister in May 1940, he realised immediately - if he had not realised before - that he had to achieve one thing in order to ensure that Britain was not defeated by Hitler's Germany: he had to enlist the US as Britain's ally. With the US alongside Britain, Hitler would be defeated - eventually. Without the US (Russia was neutral at the time), the future looked unbearably bleak. Roosevelt, as president, was predisposed to help - after a fashion and for cash on delivery - but the situation in America was overwhelmingly isolationist. One easily forgets this, in the era of our much-vaunted, so-called "special relationship", but at the nadir of Britain's fortunes, polls in the US still showed that 80% of Americans were against joining the war in Europe. Anglophobia was widespread and the US Congress was violently opposed to any form of intervention.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.0
1.0
{"commentId":265912,"authorDomain":"djehuty"}

What an amazing story! I've never heard about this before.

{"commentId":265912,"threadId":"38930","contentId":"340139","authorDomain":"djehuty"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:56 AM EDT
{"commentId":265929,"authorDomain":"farmer"}

Towards the end of the story I began to think that maybe we didn't notice the arrival of 1984 because it came much sooner, in 1940.

Thanks Aine.

{"commentId":265929,"threadId":"38930","contentId":"340139","authorDomain":"farmer"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:40 AM EDT
{"commentId":266252,"authorDomain":"aine"}

I was a little reluctant to post this, not knowing how it would be received, but then I remembered the History category and figured that would be a good spot for it and it wouldn't mess with the regular news flow. I'm glad you guys found it and read it... and liked it.

:)

{"commentId":266252,"threadId":"38930","contentId":"340139","authorDomain":"aine"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Sat Aug 26, 2006 3:21 PM EDT
{"commentId":266520,"authorDomain":"woccam"}

I lived through this conspiracy both in wartime U.S. and later in Canada. Although there were whispers and nudges, I understood nothing.

The Intrepid caper didn't come to my attention until 1976 when the Stephenson bio was published in Canada. At that time I scanted it as just another James-Bondish wartime escapade. After all, a close relative of mine had worked during the war at a secret agency in Baker Street, London, running agents in and out of occupied France. Espionage, no matter how morally questionable, was the done thing -- at least in wartime.

My father, a devoted subject of the British Crown, believed that Reasons of State could justify almost everything and anything. That remains the view of many if not most serious people today. Witness the current brouhaha over NSA wiretaps. It signifies that social sentiments are changing, at least in the democracies of the West.

During most of my lifetime, everyone who gave any thought to the matter was convinced that a sovereign State owed its duty only to its own interests. That was the way of the world. Morality in international affairs was, and largely still is, totally nonexistent.

But times are changing. The intensification of globalization, and the dense new communication networks are indeed turning the world into a global village, as Marshall McLuhan foresaw over forty years ago. Unfortunately the global village now turns out to be at war with itself (temporarily, one hopes).

Nowadays episodes like the BSC conspiracy, which was at one time shrouded in cynical chuckles, can no longer be kept quiet. The mood of Western democracies is on the turn. Large numbers of people will no longer put up with this kind of thing, even as they queasily applaud the exploits of Mossad.

George Bush and Tony Blair, with their lawyers, are trying to straddle these dangerous cross-currents, and they aren't making a very good job of it. I doubt that anyone will ever be able to.

{"commentId":266520,"threadId":"38930","contentId":"340139","authorDomain":"woccam"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Sat Aug 26, 2006 9:45 PM EDT
{"commentId":266832,"authorDomain":"Sarcophilus"}

What an amazing story.

excellent seed, Aine :-)

{"commentId":266832,"threadId":"38930","contentId":"340139","authorDomain":"Sarcophilus"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#5 - Sun Aug 27, 2006 10:21 AM EDT
{"commentId":273522,"authorDomain":"virginiadisabilitylawyer"}

What this overlooks is that despite the BSC the USA did not enter WWII until after the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor. Also, despite the BSC the America First party was very strong and anti-war sentiment was such that Roosevelt had to run on an anti-war platform in 1940. Despite the BSC the USA did not declare war on Germany until after Hitler declared war on the USA. While the BSC may have helped make the USA sympathetic to Great Britain's plight, the nation as a whole was still very much anti-war until Pearl Harbor.

{"commentId":273522,"threadId":"38930","contentId":"340139","authorDomain":"virginiadisabilitylawyer"}
    Reply#6 - Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:22 PM EDT
    {"commentId":277991,"authorDomain":"melgaard"}

    In reference to the bombing of Germany Dr Noble Frankland in 1961 told the RUSI that "The great immorality open to us in 1940 and 1941 was to lose the war against Hitler's Germany." Covert ops by Britain in the US was perfectly acceptable and justifiable. If the BSC helped to defeat Hitler so be it.

    {"commentId":277991,"threadId":"38930","contentId":"340139","authorDomain":"melgaard"}
      Reply#7 - Tue Sep 5, 2006 11:45 AM EDT
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"38930","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"38930","contentId":"340139"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking